Books
- Move Fast and Break Things: How Facebook, Google, and Amazon Cornered Culture and Undermined Democracy, by Jonathan Taplin Little, Brown, and Company 2018
Research
- Against Progress: Intellectual Property and Fundamental Values in the Internet Age, Scholarly Commons at Boston University School of Law 2022
- Addressing Infringement:Developments in Content Regulation in the US and the DNS, Stanford University May 7, 2020
- (Ab)use of Copyrightlaw as the tool of choice for censorship and reputation management, Berkmein Klein Center Collection
- Cultural, Legal, Technical, and Economic Perspectives on Copyright Online: The Case of the Music Industry. In Dutton, William (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies (2013)
Law Review Articles
- Rules of Engagement: Copyright and Automated Gatekeepers’ Influence on Creative Expression, Seton Hall Law Review 2022
- Digital Wild West: Foreign Social Media Bans, Data Privacy, and Free Speech, Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal 2022
- Tokenized: The Law of Non-Fungible Tokens and Unique Digital Property, Indiana Law Journal 2022
- A Helper for Patenting the “Unpredictable”: Artificial Intelligence, Minnesota Jounal of Law, Science, and Technology 2022
- Possessing Intangibles, Northwestern University Law Review, 2022
- The Long and Winding Road to Effective Copyright Protection in China, Pepperdine Law Review 2022
- An “OpenSea” of Infringement: The Intellectual Property Implications of NFTs, University of Cincinnati Intellectual Property and Computer Law Journal 2022
- Infringement, She Wrote: The Intellectual Property Rights of Victims in True Crime Craze, University of Cincinnati Intellectual Property and Computer Law Journal 2022
- The Patentability of Inventions with Artificial Intelligence Listed as an Inventor Following Thaler v. Hirshfeld, University of Cincinnati Intellectual Property and Computer Law Journal, 2022
- TikTok the Musical: Copyright Issues Raised by the “Ratatouille” Musical, Washington Journal of Law, Technology, and Arts 2022
- Endorsing After Death, William and Mary Law Review 2022
- The Customer Is Always Right: Trademark Law and Generic Website Names in U.S. Patent and Trademark Office v. Booking.com B.V., Boston College Law Review 2021
- Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc., Harvard Law Review 2021
- Sounds of Science: Copyright Infringement in AI Music Generator Outputs, Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology 2021
- The Importance of Being Earnestly Innovative: The Increasing Role of Intellectual Property Law in the Global Economy, University of Cincinnati Intellectual Property and Computer Law Journal 2021
- A Copy of a Copy of a Copy: Internet Mimesis and the Copyrightability of Memes, Duke Law & Technology Review 2020
- Sophia: Exploring the Ways AI May Change Intellectual Property Protections, DePaul Journal of Art, Technology and Intellectual Property Law 2019
- Does Patented Information Promote the Progress of Technology? Northwestern University Law Review 2019
- The U.S. Supreme Court Is Reining in Patent Trolls, Which Is a Win for Innovation, Harvard Business Review 2017
- Professional Video Gaming: Piracy That Pays, 49 J. Marshall L. Rev. 217 John Marshall Law Review 2015
- ‘Breakfast at Tiffany’s’: eBay Inc, Trade Mark Law and Counterfeiting, Journal of Law, Information, and Science 2011
- The Double Punch of Law and Technology: Fighting Music Piracy or Remaking Copyright in a Digital Age? University of San Francisco School of Law and Intellectual Property Bulletin 2008
- Mixing It Up on the Web: Legal Issues Arising from Internet ‘Mashups’, Intellectual Property & Technology Law Journal 2006
- The Double Punch of Law and Technology: Fighting Music Piracy or Remaking Copyright in a Digital Age? Business and Politics 2004
Laws
- The EU copyright legislation, European Commission
- Fla. Stat. § 282.0041(24), Fla. Stat. § 282.0051, United States, Florida, 2022 – Text 1, Text 2
- N.J. Stat. §§ 52:18A-234.1 et seq., United States, New Jersey, 2022 – Text
- Md. State Govt Code § 10-1501 to -1503, United States, Maryland, 2021 – Text
- Utah Code §§ 63A-18-1, -18-2, United States, Utah, 2021 – Text 1; Text 2; Text 3
- Va. Code § 2.2-203.2:4, United States, Virginia, 2021 – Text
- Ind. Code § 4-3-26 et seq., § 5-14-3.3 et seq., United States, Virginia, 2020 – Text 1, Text 2, Text 3
- Ark Code § 25-4-126 to -128, United States, Arkansas, 2019 – Text 1
- Tex. Govt. Code § 2054 et seq., Tex. Govt. Code § 2060.001 et seq., Tex. Govt, Code § 2054.137, United States, Texas 2019 – Text 1, Text 2, Text 3
- CGS § 4-67p, United States, Connecticut, 2018 – Text
- ORS § 276A.350 et seq., United States, Oregon, 2017 – Text
- 20 ILCS 45/1 to 45/99, United States, Illinois, 2014 – Text
- HRS § 27-44 to -44.2, United States, Hawaii, 2013 – Text 1, Text 2
- N.H. RSA §§ 21-R:10, -R:11, -R:13, -R:14, United States, New Hampshire, 2013 – Text 1, Text 2, Text 3, Text 4
- 22 VSA § 952, 22 VSA § 953, United States, Vermont, 2006 – Text 1, Text 2
- 44 U.S.C. § 3506(b)(6) as amended by OPEN Government Data Act (§ 202(c)(1)(A)(iv)), United States, 1995 – Text
Essays/Blogs
- The Definitive Timeline of Spotify’s Critic-Defying Journey to Rule Music, Fast Company August 6, 2018
News
- Apple Music, Spotify Lead in Streaming Tunes, But It’s Early Days, Investors Business Daily February 4, 2017
- No, Apple Isn’t Killing Off iTunes Music Downloads, Fortune May 12, 2016
- Apple’s iTunes Rules Digital Music Market with 63% Share, Apple Insider April 16, 2013
Websites
- Digital Millennium Copyright Act, Wikipedia
- Digital Rights Management, Wikipedia
- MP3, Wikipedia
- Napster, Wikipedia
- Peer-to-Peer File Sharing, Wikipedia
- How Digital Rights Management Works, How Stuff Works 2017